Friday, April 06, 2012
A Dogs Life
Friday, March 30, 2012
Middle Way
Only knows the way to future development. Current result is beyond it's remit, but gives it it's space so as to completely happen.
No Self
There's nothing that remains unchanged from one lifetime to the next.
There's nothing that remains unchanged from one moment to the next.
But what knows this?
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Independently Existing Subject
A centre of knowledge: an object capable of awareness of it's own existence.
Nowhere to be found in the entire Cosmos:
within the five groups of grasping: within anything knowable.
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Bombing the Base
When the practice breaks down under the onslaught of the Kilesas, it is time to investigate the very practitioner himself.
Quaking Kilesas at the centre of the heart.
Magic.
Blade Runner
I never saw the film nor read the book, but in the computer game, one story line has the protagonist discovering that he too is a Cyborg.
Such is the nature of mind: the personification of mental process.
Monday, February 20, 2012
What does it mean? Whom does it serve?
What does it mean? Object to be taken fairly literally: may be investigated, but the point is all within the second question.
Whom does it serve? Try to find the subject that benefits from this knowledge. Investigate what ever shows up. Don't get concerned with further questions about who is it that knows "that", keep it all down to just the two questions, keep it simple!
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
The Comprehensive Coin.
The four Aasavas, Views and Ignorance, Sense Desire and Eternal Existence. The first pair may be seen as two sides of the same coin, as also the second pair similarly for a second coin. Then again, both coins could be seen as a further two sides of a more encompassing coin: Outflows.
Saturday, February 11, 2012
Don't Know and the Effort to Know.
"Not knowing" and "Don't Know" are merely misnomers for the effort-to-know within the mind of the unenlightened practitioner. Only in the mind of the Arahat is this the correct designation. For the rest of us it is a remaining activity that has yet to become clearly comprehended.
Friday, June 17, 2011
When phenomena are unknown
that is to say - when Avija is running -
Dukkha is manifest,
then just investigate it.
When it becomes identified,
then just apply clear comprehension.
When it becomes clear
then just apply bare attention.
When it becomes objectified,
then simply name or label it
just enough to focus for knowing,
just enough for recognition and
recollection.
Ultimately, this is applied to the knowing itself.
Tuesday, July 18, 2006
Perception, jumping to conclusions
The Perception aggregate, in a blind compulsion, jumps to a conclusion with respect to a Self subject and a perceived object. If this is seen clearly enough, what else is there to do?
With sufficient clarity, the perception aggregate merely pidgeon holes objects so as to avoid having to continuously "reinvent the wheel."
If it can make these subjective conclusions and blind compulsions themselves, an object of perecption, so as to pidgeon hole them to memory, what other "layers of the onion" can there be left?
Assertive Denial
Assertive Denial
Assertions about space-time, that intrinsically deny the true nature of things just as they are. Proliferating assertions are a state of denial.
Proliferation energy in the heart
Proliferation energy in the heart.
Proliferation noise in the heart.
A Kilesa is active.
The Light that Comes from the Firefly in the Night
Extracted from:
Venerable Acariya Maha Boowa ~Nanasampanno
Wat Pa Baan Taad
June 22, 1979
Translated: Achaan Sudchaad
Where the Work of a Bhikkhu Comes to an End
"...The heart is deluded in the five Khandhas. It takes the creations of the five Khandhas as the objects of it's pleasure and sorrow for Culpas and Culpas, while Vi~n~naana flicks on and off, on and off. When it acknowledges the things that come into contact and those things disappear, Vi~n~naana also disappears. It is similar to a lightening flash, or the light that comes from the firefly in the night..."
Know Yourself, Know Your Parents
Self knowledge is wisdom. Parental knowledge is gratitude.
Our parents gave us everything they could, everything we had. They couldn't give enough to give us the best possible chance in life. Had they been wealthier they would have given us even more. Parents know the importance of generosity.
However, our perception of our parents is very often of the two people who always stopped us from doing what we wanted to do just when we wanted to do it. Children must be the most ungrateful people in any social community.
Any practitioner, having got to know something of himself through mindfulness and wisdom, is well rewarded by developing some understanding of his very own parents. Their final gift to us.
Sunday, June 04, 2006
Assumption Drivers
All thought formations are assumption driven. Clarify this proliferation of assumptions and watch the thought formations loose their power, their drivers: watch them flow out from within the heart.
Wednesday, May 31, 2006
Peripheral Vision
Peripheral Vision
Looking into the heart with the main focus of attention, peripheral vision then does the rest.
It sees that everything else isn't itself and the heart isn't itself either.
The heart just keeps chugging along doing it's job steadily. It can't afford to skylark around with different identities getting into different scenarios. It has a job to do, everything else depends on it's faultless and constant performance.
Let the knowing take this for an identity and become free from the demands of all other phenomena. Let it become the raft or last stepping stone before crossing over to the further shore.
When the knowing can let go of this there is nothing else to do.
Monday, May 29, 2006
It is always there
Let the heart be a guide and refuge. Each time one rediscovers this it, is as though for the first time.
Yet, it is always there.
Only within the heart does one have the releasing knowledge that none of this is the self, "mine" or "I". Anywhere else gives rise to burdensome identification.
Wednesday, May 17, 2006
Motivations Loosing their Power
Just observe the motivations untill they become perceptions and thus pidgeon holed, loosing their power.
Feedback Loops
The Knowing of the unreal can be compared to a negative feedback loop. Just as this knowing reveals the causes of compounded phenomena to show that they are evanecent, so the negative feedback loop constantly cancels itself out to produce a steady state, analogous to the ground of knowing.
Whereas the Knowing of the real can be compared to a positive feedback loop. Just as the knowing of the knowing is a bright, steady, robust phenomenon; the positive feedback loop can be seen as an analogy with its successive reinforcement or amplification of a phenomenon.
This is a rather tacky analogy, but it does point out the stark differences between the Real and the Unreal that the deluded mind constantly denies, and the knowing mind can't mistake. Such is the power of either careless atachment or the pure Citta.
Delusion II
Delusion
Seeing the unreal as significant.
Seeing the real as insignificant.
Wisdom
Seeing the real as significant.
Seeing the unreal as insignificant.
That's all one needs to know.
Present Moment Knowing
The Citta jumps to a conlusion at the moment of perception. From this a whole mass of proliferating assumptions arise. But if mindfulness is present then the assumptions also become a perception, pidgeon holed as a conclusion, thus breaking the cycle of conditionality and the Citta remains in it's mode of present moment Knowing.
The Source
Like an onion, skins peel off with each successive layer of perception, untill it reaches the centre, where it finds the source. This is not itself, but the result of the previous moment.
Thursday, April 06, 2006
Doubt
When ever there is doubt, the practitioner must ask, "who is it that doubts?" When this source is uncovered what is there left to doubt?
Knowing what he knows and knowing what he doesn't know: finding his way back home.
Symbolic Logic
Dhamma concepts must be clearly understood at the intellectual level before they can be intuited symbolically. Only then can they be operated on with symbolic logic: that is to say Cause and Effect, Dependent Origination, Here and Now, Conditionality, etc.
Being Dhamma, this won't include Space-Time systems unless the practitioner wishes to look at Dhukka, thus becoming mindfully careful with this sticky Kamma.
Tuesday, April 04, 2006
Broadband Connection
Broadband Connection
The Knowing is like a broadband connection: it is always on, here and now.
Friday, March 31, 2006
The Logic of the Present Moment
The Logic of the Present Moment.
Conventional, Space-Time, logic looks for causes and finds the corresponding results.
Dhamma, or Present Moment, logic looks at the current results or conditions and then looks for what these are causing.
In the absence of this clarity the outcome is conditioned, Dukkha. In the presence of this clarity the outcome is the unconditional basis, or environment, for the development of the Path.
A very simple logic, but it is all that is needed to maintain an interest in and for a steadily consistent growth in the Dhamma.
Different Kinds of Opportunity in this Hi_Tech Jungle
Fragment from a recent letter:
"...Perhaps there are different kinds of opportunities to practice in this hi_tech jungle? My meditating friend PR shows how it is possible...''
Your meditating friend PR makes me think of some Oriental people that I have briefly known in London & Watford. Particularly nurses, who would show impressive skill & patience during incredibly long shifts. The significance of this was not appreciated until, here at Wat Pa Baan Taad, I met a Bhikkhu ordained just for the rains (LTMB never normally allows this). He is a nurse of Commodore rank in the Thai navy. He told me that they routinely worked, between actual duty & voluntary projects, something like 20hrs a day, i.e. four hours sleep was quite normal for him too.
A further observation at Wat Thai, Wimbledon, several years ago. For the whole Summer, visiting almost every Sunday morning, I was able to observe the enthusiasm of many of the children, perhaps 6 to 12yrs old, as they went to meditation lessons held especially for them by senior Bhikkhus.
So, where this is all leading to is a scenario that goes something like this:
A Thai or Chinese child starts meditating at about the age of say six (I've been told that children of this age learn it very easily). By the time they are twelve they are quite skilled at it. They then go through secondary & higher education well equipped to deal with all it's stresses. They can then enter a profession, such as the medical, & give to it a commitment worthy of the 'monastic' traditions. The final result is a highly accomplished being. But the best part of it is that they can spot another meditator a mile away: something I noticed very early on in my practice.
Not that I want to detract from the Bhikkhu life: the responsibility of the Sangha is to ensure that the Dhamma is passed on to the next generation with it's vitality & relevance intact.
Further on Kilesas
Further on Kilesas
To fully understand Kilesas, so as to defeat them, it is important to remember to include any reflections on Dhamma that are non-mindful, mindless, proliferation. That is to say, not "mapping" a reflection to actual phenomenal manifestations in the present moment, not investigating them. Anything that is propounded as some kind of a view to an imaginary audience or a rehearsal for some future hypothetical examination, etc. all this is also Kilesa. Learning to recognise them with clarity develops it's own momentum.
A skilful Kilesa to develop is to keep coming back to the Knowing in the present moment and developing that momentum.
One Hundred and Eighty Degrees
One Hundred and Eighty Degrees
Phenomena arise in the present moment and the practitioner looks for causes: Kilesas. Later, the practitioner may find it more useful to turn through a hundred and eighty degrees and look for results caused by things presently arising: Outflows.
He may then dwell on just this Knowing.
Six and Two Threes
Six and Two Threes
Intellectuals, hate types, prefer void (annihilationist) views. Faith, greed types prefer cosmic (eternalist) views.
Six of one and half a dozen of the other: both are wrong. But, non the less, both will get the practitioner to the point where the last attachment is a Kilesa Raft built around either of these favoured views: to be let go of at some suitable Kammic window of opportunity.
No Right Self View
No Right Self View
One can't say that the Knowing is identical with phenomena. For if the Knowing is phenomena, then what is it that knows this?
One can't say that the Knowing is embedded, immersed or enmeshed in phenomena: for it is clearly detached from them.
One can't say that the Knowing owns phenomena, for it can do nothing with them. Nor can one say that phenomena own the Knowing, for neither can they do anything with it.
Nor can one say that the Knowing is detached from phenomena: clearly it isn't, for how could it know them?
But, then again, what is it that knows all this?
Thursday, March 09, 2006
The Untouchable
The Untouchable
The Knowing is not touched by anything at all. Greed, lust, hatred, jealousy, disgust; non of this can touch the Knowing. The Knowing can know itself, but even this doesn't touch it and it knows this too. It is a bit like a camera that can't photograph itself, yet knows of it's own existence in the sense that when it malfunctions it's photos are correspondingly affected.
Similarly, when the Knowing is affected by delusion it's view of the world is correspondingly affected. But as soon as it knows this this knowing arises and is completely untouched by it: in this sense it can be said to be always fresh.
Anything coming from delusion is knowable in a detached way, it can be investigated and described, but the Knowing can only be known. The practitioner may talk about this, but as soon as he does so the knowing seems to disappear, becomes obscured, only to return to view as soon as the dissertation stops and a resumption of the knowing is effected.
All else can be said to be a mirage, it only exists while it is not scrutinised: the knowing however, holds steady, unchanging and untouchable whilst under the closest scrutiny, but nothing can be done to it, with it nor be said about it.
White Noise II
White Noise is a technique for causing a clinical, anaesthetic effect, and has been used in minor surgery and dentistry. The patient listens to a generator of all the audio frequencies of the human ear.
The analogy with Kamatana meditation is quite useful. The noisy mind producing an effect such that the sensations associated with the Heart, at the centre of the chest, are quite unobservable, just as though it were under a kind of local anaesthetic. But as attention is directed at the spot, the mind quietens, the white noise subsides and the sensations within the heart gradually become clear and the practice of mindfulness can continue.
Investigation as proliferation
Investigation as a proliferation of Delusion or Becoming.
Developing skilful Kilesas, which in the absence of mindfulness, give rise to Dukkha & attachment.
All this results from a flow of unquestioned assumptions that current phenomena are the same as, or not changed from, associated memories. This includes the possibility that these memories are inaccurate.
Saturday, February 25, 2006
The Eternal Present Moment
The Eternal Present Moment
Where change is no longer conditioning. Conditioning only exists when Space-Time exists.
But what knows this?
Reflections on Magga Puja
An excerpt from a letter dated around 21/Feb/06.
I have never gone into this very deeply, but something like two thousand five hundred Arahants spontaneously came to the Buddha on the full moon of February. I can only think that this being the coldest full moon of the year, and thus the most unconducive to any kind of unnecessary activity, the Arahants wanted to demonstrate the correct attitude of a Dhamma practitioner to such reluctant negativity, for the benefit of all sentient beings, for all time to come. The Lord Buddha, in his infinite wisdom and boundless compassion, complied with a sermon uniquely befitting such an auspicious occasion. The Ovaaddha Patimokha, in only three lines, encapsulates the entire Buddha Dhamma with just these few words:
Do only Good
Avoid all Evil
Purify the Heart
This was the only recorded time that the Arahants came together in quite this way.
Reflections On Kamma
An excerpt from a letter dated around 21/Feb/06.
Firstly, I have to say that I'm no scholar, so quoting references is a rather weak point. But, as I understand it, a teaching historical Buddha has perfected the ten perfections prior to his last life so as to be capable of rediscovering the Dhamma, which would have died out by that time. It is hard enough to realise the Dhamma when it is clearly taught, but to find it anew must take a very special kind of person.
My reading is somewhat restricted due mainly to dyslexia, but have had some good luck in recommendations. First there was "The Word of the Buddha", Nyanatiloka; then "The Life of the Buddha", Nyanamoli; both in the Buddhist Publication Society, Kandy, Sri Lanka. Then various books by Nyanaponika all of which are in the BPS (which he founded), most notably "The Heart of Buddhist Meditation" and "The Power of Mindfulness"; but the best reference is SomaThera's translation of the Satipathana Sutta, commentaries & subcomys, (the format of which seems to have become a standard for this kind of work), I think it is called "The Way of Mindfulness" and is always reprinted in the same bright orange cover, again by BPS. Then the last BPS editor, Bhikkhu Bodhi, did some very fine works. All these, and more, can be found in the UK Wisdom web site: it is very sympathetic to the Theravada school. All these books give excellent reference details for all the passages that they quote from the Pali Cannon, which is, more or less, the extent of my knowledge. I must not forget Nyanamoli's translation of the Visudimagga, his non tech foot notes make fascinating reading, again BPS. What I like about Nyanamoli is his experimental approach: in the introduction to his "Guide" (Pali Text Society) he talks about the contextual function of language as against the more commonly held view of grammatical structure. In the reading of Pali, (or for that matter any other spiritual (or even artistic) tradition), this makes quite a lot of sense to me, though for technology and legality, the grammatical structure is probably more appropriate. Then I must not forget the many editions of the Dhamma Paada, especially Narada's several treatments. Lastly, but by no means leastly, Dr Henepola Gunaratana's "Mindfulness in Plain English" is frequently highly recommended. I have only seen exerts from this and they are most impressive.
For myself, I just take scriptural materials at face value and check them out in my own mindfulness practice. Anything of relevance I just quote off the top of my head and assume that my co-respondent will decided for himself on the validity of any point that I'm making. Mine is an essentially practical approach and as such am happy to have found the Forrest Tradition, which seems to reflect this attitude to a very high degree of skill and attainment. A good resource is our very own <http://www.luangta.com> if you have good Thai, or else:-
<http://www.forestdhammabooks.com>
Alternatively, <http://www.accesstoinsight.org/forest>
gives a good sample of first generation disciples of Ajaan Mun.
Having said all that, it may be useful, at this point, to consider some actual reflection on Kamma. Whole books are filled on this topic alone. It is most fruitful, bringing in the whole gamut of Pali Buddhism, from naive Cosmology to the eternal present moment that is mindfulness.
As you have probably gathered, this is an essentially practical approach and not too orthodox: though I like to feel that it is in fact consistent with "the party line", just a different way of looking at it. The Ajaan Mun lineage (at least, if not the whole of Forest traditions in general) put a lot of emphasis on the pure state of the Citta - the one who knows - far more so than what seems to be the case in scholastic Pali (where the emphasis is with stressing the third characteristic of 'no-self'). It seems to take the dryness out of Pali Buddhism and give it a certain spiritual nourishment: at Wat Pa Baan Taad we seem to get some keen interest from quite a few Mahayanists.
There is no contradiction here, and understanding this non-paradox is quite useful, if not pivotal, for many (interested) people: it all comes down to context.
There is no Self in the five Kundas. But something knows this! What is it that knows? The Citta never dies and was never born. There is always this knowing, it is merely a matter of realising it. Everything in Sa.msaara is in a constant state of flux: but what knows this? This knowing is the one constant element, it just doesn't realise it. Eventually it will realise that it has never been anything else.
However, it cannot know itself directly. The analogy is a camera being incapable of ever photographing itself. My own right eyeball has never directly seen my left eyeball, never mind it's own physical self. But the Citta can know itself indirectly, the most important aspect of this being that it is not anywhere to be found in the five Khandhas, nor can be said to own them in any way at all. It merely identifies with them, and in a bewildering number of ways: never for a moment suspecting that it is in fact doing this: nor that it needn't. This gives rise to the basic paranoia of annihilation: the flip side of which is the craving for sentient existence (meditators very soon developing a craving for fine material and non material existence).
We can now talk about Kamma in the context of accumulating tendencies. A problem arises in the life of a sentient being and he finds a solution that solves it very efficiently. So much so that he is tempted to use this solution the next time the problem arises. But things being as they are, nothing ever comes around again in exactly the same way, but the solution still works just as well, maybe for slightly different reasons. So the being is tempted to use this solution more often for wider variations of the problem, so much so that this solution begins to become a reflex response to this class of problem. And so a habit is born, over years becoming a compulsion until it is quite obsessive even if not as successful as it was initially. This could be a thought or attitude dealing with an unhappy state of mind. So we have a conditioning, accumulating tendency. It is so subtle that in the Forest Tradition mere thinking is understood as Kamma formations. These formations becoming Kilesas or mental functions with a will of their own, that for the practitioner become powerful hindrances to progress towards enlightenment, since this will result in their annihilation.
The approach of the Forest tradition is to simply realise that all this is just a manner of speaking, and that it is the Citta that is unknowingly doing everything (though serially, just one thing at a time (consistent with an ever changing 'now')): and that mindfulness is the practice that will bring it all down to a knowing of the nature of the (flux that is the) present moment, just as it is. If nothing else, this skilful Kamma (coming from a Citta that is still deluded) will result in skilful Kilesas in the future: which will still (be annihilated, or) have to be abandoned along with all the unskilful ones (depending on which way one looks at it).
Rebirth and past lives is just an extension of this concept. In its simplest form, rebirth is exactly the same as any two successive thought moments during a normal life. Just as a conditioned moment of consciousness passes away, so the next moment of consciousness arises conditioned by the previous one. At the time of death, at the dissolution of the body, the last moment of consciousness of that body conditions the next moment of consciousness, initiating an existence suitable (or corresponding) to it. A popular misconception is of a Citta floating around the Cosmos in search of some suitable landing strip, which is just more Space-Time assumption.
So, how long has this been going on for? Well, long enough for every single one of us to have had every conceivable kind of existence, (each one) for an incalculable number of life times. Looking at ones previous life or few doesn't even scratch the surface, though the strongest conditioning does seem to come from these in many cases.
For a comprehensive study of case histories I don't think you can beat Dr Ian Stevenson's work, and to a lesser extent the late Francis Story ("The Case for Rebirth") with whom he collaborated for a while (in Sri Lanka). I came across a smaller book entitled "The Children that Time Forgot" dealing with British cases, can't remember the two authors names, but the format was very similar.
The bottom line is that preoccupation with rebirth is very much an activity of Delusion, i.e. Space-Time. The power of the Sword of Wisdom will only ever be found in a close study of one's basic underlying assumptions. Time is a wrong interpretation (with respect to the 4NT) of changing moments of consciousness, and enables the jump to a conclusion of the existence of (movement and hence) space. These things are useful (in the world) but non the less pure convention: unspoken and unquestioned. The only reality that will liberate anyone from Dukkha is the correct assumptions (wrt 4NT) about the eternal ever-changing present moment, which (initially) requires a conscious effort, but (non the less) is known and questioned. Past lives illuminate the Dhamma (dependent origination), but non the less are a red herring to earnest practice (the practitioner must decide for himself how useful or otherwise this contemplation is, (I myself once went through a phase of Mt (Su)Maru reflection and found it enormously useful (though more wrt interconnectedness (e.g. telepathy, coincidence, divination, I_Ching etc.)))).
A Self Gratifying Process
A self gratifying process that has no Knowing.
Motivated by ignorance.
Born and dies, susceptible to Dukkha.
But what knows?
Generosity
Generosity
A respect for the Basic Human Rights of the recipient, their freedom to develop to their maximum potential.
Without this respect there is no Generosity in the transaction.
Thus the reason why Generosity is the first of the Ten Perfections in the development of the Bodhistatta path.
Monday, February 13, 2006
What is Dukkha?
What is Dukkha?
When the Citta goes three dimensional.
Just looking at this brings it back to the eternal now. Eventually, it realises it's never been anywhere else.
The Basic Paranoia
The Basic Paranoia
Due to not realising it's own true nature the Citta, in Space_Time mode, is under a constant fundamental terror of imminent annihilation.
The logical consequences of this are a reciprocal craving-for-existence, and on the back of this a further extenuation: of craving for sensory input. This expresses itself as sensual desire: on both sides of the coin - attraction and aversion.
So what then is Dukkha? When the Citta goes three-dimensional, one just needs to look at this in order to bring it back to the eternal-now. It will have an awkward, unsatisfactoryness; a solidity brought on by the Citta's attempts to sustain something that does not in fact exist of itself: just looking for the assumptions behind this attempt will expose it to a clearer view, and it's evanescent characteristics.
All of which is above and behind the usual understanding of dissatisfaction - from full blown suffering to the subtlest anguish and boredom.
Eventually, the Citta will realise that the refuge, from this proliferation of perfect logical assumption, is in fact in the paradoxical eternal-present-moment: and finally, that it's never ever been anywhere else.
Think about it
Think about it
The reciprocal of nothing is infinity.
The reciprocal of infinity is nothing.
But what knows this?
Boredom
Boredom
An assumption that what ever is currently manifesting in the Citta is fully known to it, in that it holds no further surprises. But if one knows this object so well, how-come one can't do anything with it.
And what is it that knows this?
Where does Time come from?
Where does Time come from? Sequences of memory trigger an assumption of Time. Cause driven change is the spring board for the intuitive 'jump to the conclusion' of Sequence. The knowing of this, with sufficient clarity, is all that is required for a return to mindfulness in the present moment. Just don't hang on to it.
Sunday, February 05, 2006
Same questions, different answers.
Same questions, different answers.
Back in the '70's, a group of Western teachers, mostly from IMS, compiled a list of ten questions that they intended to put to several pre-selected Oriental teachers of note. They fully expected to get different answers to each question, and at the end of their tour collated the data and published the results. The title of the book was something like "Living Mediation Masters" and the editor may have been Jack Kornfeld. As soon as I get the details right, I'll confirm or amend this accordingly.
The point of this piece being, that each practitioner finds his own path, and consequently comes to teach a different - his own - view of the 'Dhamma'.
It is quite traditional for individual students to then search for the teacher who's Dhamma is most in accord with their own Kammic predisposition, having first served an initial training - apprenticeship - period of five years with their local teacher.
Space and Time
Space and Time
Instead of looking at Change in a timeless - an eternal - present moment, delusion assumes Time and views the consequences of that: Space.
For Space to exist, Time is required, if the result is to have freedom of movement. Space is meaningless as a frozen snap-shot, and only Time will allow travel across a distance.
However, if the correct assumptions are made, ceaseless but conditioned change in an eternal, timeless, present moment, the consequences are quite different: the resulting experience is quite different.
It is within this environment that the Citta gets to realise its own true nature and all notions of Space, Time, Eternal, Present or Snap-shots loose any meaning. Just that knowing of things, just as they are, is all that remains.
But where does Time come from? Sequences of memory trigger an assumption of Time. Change is the spring board for the intuitive 'jump to the conclusion' of Sequence. The knowing of this, with sufficient clarity, is all that is required for a return to mindfulness in the present moment. Just don't hang on to it.
Delusion
Subjectivity = arising factors
Subjectivity = arising factors
objectivity = dissolution factors
When these two conditionally interact, we have both arising and dissolution factors.
All of which may be internal, external or both internal and external.
One just needs to be clear of which at any given moment.
Objectivity = arising factors
subjectivity = dissolution factors
When these two conditionally interact, we have both arising and dissolution factors.
All of which may be internal, external or both internal and external.
Whilst clarity is present, one just needs to know.
Maths
Maths
Freedom from delusion of false, i.e. unspoken, unquestioned assumptions. Freedom in known assumptions, clearly understanding that they are just ways of speaking, useful for establishing a context for perceptions, so as to eventually see the paradox in that context when using its own logic.
Thus, the path to the Citta realising it's own true nature: through realising both the limitations and usefulness in conventional thought: and thereby the letting go of it.
But what knows this?
Thursday, January 19, 2006
Kilesas getting you down?
Where there's muck
The Buddha once made an analogy
Delusion
Cause and Effect
Subject & Object
dhammas = mindfulness
It shouldn't be like this
Intoxication
Biases, Influxes & Outflows
Know their arising.
Know their characteristics.
Eternal Process
But what is it that knows?
The Predicament
Dependent Origination
Freshness
The out-flow of assumptions
Mindlessly the Citta states an assertion
Vapour Trails
I am not that
Nothing can be said about the Knowing
Analogy, just a manner of speaking
Memory, Hysteresis and Conditioning
The Jhaanas do not need to be developed
The Problem of Space and Time
Exhortation, the gift of a brilliant teacher
An Engineers Dhamma
Proliferation
Dukkha is the Citta doing something
The last stronghold of Subjectivity
The last stronghold of Subjectivity
The heart is the last stronghold of subjectivity. When the Citta sees the luminous cloud and penetrates it with the three characteristics, it is left with just that Knowing and enjoys that state for some time. Latter, when it returns to this, it is able to know that state and the Knowing of it. It is no longer located in the heart. It no longer has a physical location.
But the full freedom of the heart is still some way off. Only when Samaadhi has been fully cultivated will the Citta have the ability to rest in the Knowing at will: or alternatively stay with the Knowing of any arising perception, or phenomena, for as long as needed without any disturbance by it at all.