Thursday, January 19, 2006
Kilesas getting you down?
Where there's muck
The Buddha once made an analogy
Delusion
Cause and Effect
Subject & Object
dhammas = mindfulness
It shouldn't be like this
Intoxication
Biases, Influxes & Outflows
Know their arising.
Know their characteristics.
Eternal Process
But what is it that knows?
The Predicament
Dependent Origination
Freshness
The out-flow of assumptions
Mindlessly the Citta states an assertion
Vapour Trails
I am not that
Nothing can be said about the Knowing
Analogy, just a manner of speaking
Memory, Hysteresis and Conditioning
The Jhaanas do not need to be developed
The Problem of Space and Time
Exhortation, the gift of a brilliant teacher
An Engineers Dhamma
Proliferation
Dukkha is the Citta doing something
The last stronghold of Subjectivity
The last stronghold of Subjectivity
The heart is the last stronghold of subjectivity. When the Citta sees the luminous cloud and penetrates it with the three characteristics, it is left with just that Knowing and enjoys that state for some time. Latter, when it returns to this, it is able to know that state and the Knowing of it. It is no longer located in the heart. It no longer has a physical location.
But the full freedom of the heart is still some way off. Only when Samaadhi has been fully cultivated will the Citta have the ability to rest in the Knowing at will: or alternatively stay with the Knowing of any arising perception, or phenomena, for as long as needed without any disturbance by it at all.
Wednesday, January 18, 2006
Luminous Clouds
Luminous Clouds. An interesting analogy.
At dusk and dawn the sky often turns a brilliant and beautiful deep orange-red. As is generally known, this is caused by water vapour in the atmosphere. But when the Sun is high this brilliant and beautiful hue vanishes and leaves behind a not quite perfectly clear sky. It is not a deep blue, and the air is heavy and saps the energy leaving the mind and body dull and drained of energy.
On other occasions, the sky may be completely clear at dusk and dawn . This is no doubt caused by the complete absence of water vapour in the atmosphere. And when, in this case, the Sun is high the result is a perfectly clear sky. It is a deep blue, and the air is light and charged with energy giving the mind and body enormous vitality.
This is a good analogy to the mind in an advanced stage of mindful clarity, where greed & hate are absent & only the dullness of delusion remains: a subtle kilesa sparkling in the energy of the focused mind.
If the practitioner develops his mindfulness according to knowing the knowable as knowable: the unknowable as unknowable. Staying with the Knowing, always asking " . . . if this (subjectivity) is the Knowing then what is it that knows . . . ": this meditator will, in the due course of time, come to a stage where the mind becomes brilliantly bright and radiant. It will have a very seductive appeal and seem quite wonderful and this state can be seen to be analogous to the red sky at dusk or dawn. But the question remains: " . . . if this is me, then who is it that knows? . . . ". Such a question will objectify and thus release this energy, giving way to a state of mind where the only thought that can harmonise with it will just be " . . . knowing . . . ". The mind in this state is quite clear and free. All other thought ceases and if forced will only jar the system: even " . . . knowing the knowing . . . " will seem inappropriate. Just " . . . knowing . . . " is all that will fit here. This state is most enjoyable and is analogous to the clear blue sky at dusk and dawn, with its sense of lightness, freedom and energy.
Self Destruction
Self Destruction.
The Ego is all set for self destruction, but just doesn't know it.
Kilesas get corralled into the Citta where they gradually become (set themselves up as) a sitting target (for Insight), as they run out of options. All this, under the action of Mindfulness and Clear Comprehension (aka Clarity or Wisdom).
Delusion is not seeing this: not understanding it in this way.
Subjectivity does not arise on its own
Subjectivity does not arise on its own: it requires objectivity to trigger it. The initialising object may well be of similar substance to the ensuing proliferation but is still an object non the less.
It may help to see the practice as consisting of two steps. The first is to objectify subjectivity, simply by Knowing it just as it is. The second is to see the resultant object as not the Knowing. I.e. what is it that knows this. Don't know? That will do.
Differences
Differences
Difference between Direct Knowing & objectivity is that objectivity triggers off fresh subjective proliferation: Direct Knowing won't, it just knows.
At the time of the last out breath
At the time of the last out breath, the aggregates die down: just the Knowing remains.
If mindfulness is present and it hasn't done so already, it may realise it's own true nature: enlightened or deluded, it cannot die: it was never born.
Contented Heart
Contented Heart
A practice session starts and the Citta begins by suppressing it's unknown activities and forces attention onto the physical heart, visualising it reciting "Buttho". These unknown activities become more persistent, so the ever innovative Citta imagines the unknown activities to recite the "Buttho". This works for a while, but the unknown activities become even stronger as they crave expression. So the Citta further imagines the unknown activities as out flows of energy from the physical heart. This results in a steady state that soon becomes tedious. So the Citta decides to 'map' some Dhamma on to this Dukkha and duly contemplates the following:-
" . . . This outflow is known . . . ". This knowing eases the Dukkha.
" . . . The arising of this outflow is known . . . ". This knowing eases the Dukkha a little further.
" . . . The ceasing of this outflow is known . . . ". This knowing further eases the Dukkha and encourages further imaginative 'mapping'.
" . . . The way leading to the future ceasing of this outflow is known . . . ". The Heart rests contented with this knowing.
Steven Hawking
Steven Hawking once said something like:
" . . . The purpose of Science is to provide the intellectual equipment or framework to enable an understanding of the basic Human Predicament . . . ".
By using analogies from science, a description of a Myth can be built up that is sufficiently sophisticated, for the modern sceptical mind, to be both plausible and satisfying.
The Citta Fly Wheel
The Citta Fly Wheel
Fragments from a letter to a disciple, 1989.
'. . . I couldn't help laughing about your meditation practice on TA's birthday. I suggest that the borrowed flat is your body. T's 30 young friends are kilesas, the badly cooked food could be dissatisfaction with what enters through the senses. Some of the others I'm not sure about but you should be able to work it out. In fact, as your Citta produced it, you are the only person who can work it out properly. One can learn from these things provided that one has not been "infected" by a learnt psychological system (e.g.. Freud). What you describe displays anxiety - and it is worth remembering that the Aramana (objects and symbols that support and set-up states of the Citta) which have been operative prior to sleeping (maybe several hours before) can cause emotional states like anxiety which continue on like a fly wheel. Then one's dreams put up symbols and situations to 'explain' and support the anxiety. In other words, in ordinary life, an external situation may give rise to an anxiety. In a dream, the anxiety gives rise to the (projected) external situation . . ."
" . . . How to cope with it? I suggest that the key to it is thinking - incessant thinking. Stop the thinking and the problems cease, the anxiety ceases and the restlessness ceases. How to stop thoughts? Use a Parikamma such as Buddho and place your attention at your heart. Not by feeling it, but by mind. Try doing the same for the heart and think of the heart saying "Buddho" and listen to it coming from the heart. If you can't hear it, pay more attention to the heart - listen hard.
Try this and see if it helps.
All for now,
Pa~n~navadho . . ."
The Citta does everything
The Citta does everything.
Fragment of a letter to a disciple, year not given but most likely after 1979.
'. . . The term Upadana Khandhas should not be called the "Grasping Khandhas". The Khandhas are so to speak "foreign matter" and they go their own way according to the laws of nature. The grasping is in the Kilesas which are infused in the Citta, using the power of the Citta and they grasp and hold tight to the Khandhas. Therefore they should truly be called the "Grasped Khandhas". The only sense in which "Grasping Khandhas" can be used correctly is that the Khandhas are the (passive) agents of the grasping Citta and so go about grasping this and that in the outer world. Like a man who makes a Robot and uses it to promote his grasping desires. To call it a grasping Robot is only a way of speaking and not really correct. The reason why most people talk about the "Grasping Khandhas" is that they have read books written or translated by people who don't understand Dhamma. To go talking without a proper understanding of the underlying principles is likely to be "Parrot talk".
I hope this helps.
Yours,
Pa~n~navadho . . .'
The Buddha didn't say
The Buddha didn't say he directly knew the Unborn, the Uncreated, the Unformed & the Unbecome. He only said that there was an escape from the Born, the Created, the Formed & the Become.
And because there was this escape from the Born, the Created, the Formed & the Become, he declared that there was this Unborn, Uncreated, Unformed & Unbecome.
Rising above it all
Rising above it all
Atention directed at the Citta, at the centre of the chest, enables it to rise above any and every manipulation or pull of the feelings and emotions.
This just has to be the most usefull point for developing concenration. When applied in combination with the _parikamma_ BUDDHO it is indeed very usefull for driving out the Kilesas from the heart: it goes against the grain and into the _right_ diretion every time.
White Noise in the Heart II
White Noise in the Heart II
The White Noise in the Heart bears uncanny correspondence with activity in the Head. An excellent exercise in Mindfulness is to watch sensations at the centre of the chest whilst noting cranial activity. Which causes which? Which of these views is the more useful in terms of practice, and is it always so? And of course: who or what is it that knows?
The Out Flows exist
The Out Flows exist. They arise because they are not known. They cease when they are known. Their future non arising depends on the perfection of this knowing.
Aasavas are arising factors
Aasavas are arising factors.
The Anicca characteristic of arising is inherent in all phenomena. But where do they arise from? The only place they can come from is the Citta.
However, the Citta is not knowable to the 5 khandhas or the 6 sense bases, so phenomena appear to arise from the Plenum Void. However, this view does not take the practitioner very far.
A much more productive view is to take the Citta as the source of all phenomena, with it's out-flows as the unknowing and unsuspecting drivers of such knowable objects. This will break the grip of subjectivity every time, where ever it is accompanied with sufficient clarity.
It may help some meditators if the very centre of the chest, just above the Sternum, is contemplated as the physical location of the deluded, unenlightened Citta.
Proliferation arises out of subjectivity
Proliferation arises out of subjectivity, triggered by an object. Delusion doesn't know this and sees the World from the perspective of this. The Knowing sees this as just one piece in the complete World view but does nothing more than that: and knows that too.
The Deluded Driver
The Deluded Driver.
The ignorant & deluded driver, behind absolutely every thing, finally comes to peace and rest as soon as he realises it sufficiently well.
The Mind Only School
The Mind Only School.
Two Variants of this Chinese Thought
One says that everything is "out there" but the knowing of it is entirely in the mind.
The other says that every thing is mind made & that that there is nothing "out there" at all.
LuangPow Pa~n~navadho often said he felt that the second School had the better view for development of the Path. Though, the best view of all could well be a hybrid of the two:
The physical world is "out there" and some of the mental world too, whilst the remainder of the mental world is generated internally. But it is all mind known & mind interpreted: so that for all practical purposes the second School does in fact have the better view for Path cultivation.
Whatever it takes
Seeing subjectivity arising; seeing arising things in subjectivity.
Seeing subjectivity as "Out-flows/Aasavas", seeing "Out-flows/Aasavas" in subjectivity.
Seeing fear as subjectivity, seeing subjectivity in fear.
Seeing subjectivity as subjectivity, as subjectivity, as subjectivity, as subjectivity. Whatever it takes to objectify it!
A Rose by any other name
". . . A Rose by any other name smells just as sweet. . ."
William Shakespeare
Can't does every thing
Can't does every thing.
Whenever one finds one is unable to do something, chances are that one can: the effort is merely uncoordinated: giving rise to the 'can't' energy.
Just put your faith into it, stand back and watch.
The Kilesa Raft
The Kilesa Raft.
The Kilesas are simply the unknown, unspoken & unquestioned conditioning of the Citta, & are the resultants of past Kamma, as they ripen in the present moment.
Thus the perceived need to create skilful Kamma in the present time, over & above any good, healthy & wholesome Kamma, so as to have skilful Kilesas in a future lifetime. Thus building a Kilesa "Raft" which the the practitioner can use to "cross over" the stream of Samsara & "reach the further shore" of Realisation.
Thus, on reaching "the further shore" the raft can then be left abandoned at the waters edge or "let go of" & the practitioner thus walks on "free of all burdens".
White noise in the heart
White noise in the heart produced from a mass of conditioned (educated) brain activity (thought). When such thought dies down, the heart gets clearer signals and hence becomes more data efficient.
Thus a transition from perception to response, i.e. a thought, is much more efficient and thus more intelligent.
Monday, January 16, 2006
I am the Subject
I am the Subject. Everything else is the object. There is no subject to look for. Just look at objects; listen to objects; smell objects; taste objects; hear objects; touch objects; perceive objects: but one can't find a subject anywhere, in anything.
Include subjectivity
Include subjectivity:
see subjectivity in the Including.
Include "I can't"
Include "It won't"
Include any and every kind of fear and apprehension, from blind panic to doubt or mild concern.
Include the "knowing":
see subjectivity arise within the "knowing".
But then again, who is it that "knows"?
Mirror, mirror on the wall
Mirror, mirror on the wall.
When a Practitioner looks into a mirror all he sees is a reflection of himself. When he looks into his heart all he sees is any activity of the heart that corresponds to his gazing at it. The Practitioner thus mindful, will only ever know the fading of correspondingly previous activities or concerns.
However, given that the basic nature of the Citta is in 'just knowing', any Practitioner who simply gazes at the heart, watching it's functions, will gradually notice profound changes as the Kilesas (the egotistical - neurotic activities that he is, thus far, unaware of) die down to this basic level of 'just knowing': the analogy with the mirror then breaks down completely, for in this case the 'reflection' disappears.
Though, perhaps more unexpectedly, the reaction to this is one of immediate recognition: a coming home. The Citta finally realising it's own true nature.
However, this does require that the Kilesas are entirely dormant, if only briefly in a 'Kammic window of opportunity', for (both good and bad) their response will give rise to an unexpected experience of some disquiet for the Practitioner.
Hence the need for a conventional or intellectual understanding prior to any practice.
The Night of the Buddha's Awakening
The Night of the Buddha's Awakening.
In 1st watch sees his own past lives. In 2nd watch, generalises main characteristics to every one else's past lives. In 3rd watch logically abstracts the linking core essentials: when this becomes sufficiently clear - Eureka!
This is a format for contemplation in general. A reverse variation on this is to take a 'finished' teaching and 'map' it to one's own observations & experience via a more general application.
Subjectivity
Subjectivity -> subjective feelings -> Proliferation of assumptions -> Wrong conclusion.
Proliferation of assumptions -> subjective feelings -> Subjectivity -> Wrong conclusion.
Objectivity -> objective feelings -> perception of Anicca -> Right conclusion & assumptions.
Perception of Anicca -> objective feelings -> Objectivity -> Right conclusion & assumptions.
Wrong conclusion & assumptions includes the view that the self is a detached observer.
Right conclusion & assumptions includes knowing every thing above.
Beating the System
Beating the System.
Essentially, doing everything for one's self and not depending on others. This way one gets all the credit or blame for one's successes or failures. Though it does help to know what the problems are to begin with.
Delusion mistakes the Knowable as Unknowable
Delusion mistakes the Knowable as Unknowable and the Unknowable as Knowable.
Whereas reality is seeing the Knowable as Knowable and the Unknowable as Unknowable.
So simple.
Mindfulness & Energy
Mindfulness & Energy.
When energy is low, the practice is dull & sleepy. Attention needs to be directed towards effort/energy. Applying effort to arousing energy is essentially a mindful skill and mindfulness is duly developed through the practice of arousing energy with this skilful effort. It is, indeed, the recommended way to commence a session of formal seated practice.
Faith & concentration are an excellent way of going to sleep for the same reason: it is a further skilful means in the cultivation of mindfulness.
Investigation becomes a mindfulness practice when it becomes too intense & needs trimming: or is required to counter balance faith or confidence.
Don't Know Mind
"Don't Know Mind. That's the best one. Keep the Don't Know Mind."
Zen Master Tic Nat Han
Fearing fear
Fearing fear.
The problem with fear is fearing it. Fear on its own is just fear, arising & ceasing just like everything else.
Only when fear is feared does it escalate/proliferate: i.e.. when it is subjective. But when objectified it exhibits the Dhamma, i.e.. three characteristics, internal & external, cause & effect, etc.: and as such, a gateway to Nibbana.
There is fear & there is the knowing of fear. Thus the middle way is in being with the knowing of fear.
Ideograms - Ideawords
Ideograms - Ideawords
Thai & Chinese languages are context driven whereas European languages are structurally driven. Thus Thai words are seen as being functionally equivalent to Chinese characters.
Hence Thai is good for reflective purposes but not for legal or technical applications, whereas Western languages are good for legal and technical purposes, though not for reflective ones.
Therefore the need for much writing & rewriting by many different adepts in Western languages for a given translation of an original reflective tract in Thai.
Thus enabling the Western reader to realise the wealth of meaning in it & also to break him out of the accurate though restricted conditioning of the Western intellectual tradition: something not at all necessary for the traditionally inclined Oriental.
For a more complete discussion of this fascinating topic see Bhikkhu ~Naa.namoli's introduction to his translation for: The Guide (NETTI PPAKARA.NA'M according to Kaccaana Thera), Pali Text Society, 1977.
Naivety and the Kilesas
Naivety and the Kilesas.
The only valid motive for writing these notes is for developing clarity. All other motives, no matter how altruistic, are off the mark.
Naivety is essentially not believing that the Kilesas are as bad as they actually are. In this context, Being with the Knowing is the ultimate act of defiance.
Further more this gives rise to a strong sense of ultimate victory over the Kilesas. In short, it is only the Arahant who is completely free of naivety.
Education
Education.
An Example of Generosity or a couple of topics short of a full course?
Highlighting the nature of - and at the same time an aplication for - "skilful generosity" in every day life. An opportunity for those who are open to it.
Horoscope Kamma
Horoscope Kamma
Fragment from a letter by LuangPow Pa~n~navadho to his disciple, dated 28/Dec/79
" . . . I am sorry to hear you are all in trouble with Uranus. I am not sure where cause/effect comes in here but I am fairly certain that Uranus cannot do more than trigger the results which arise from causes that one has made by one's own volition in the past. As most people are "asleep" they make causes unthinkingly and unknowingly and not believing that what they do will come back on them. Then when the time comes, the results arise as a complete surprise - and usually unwelcome. This is the danger of this world - not knowing - for if we all knew the results of actions, who would ever do anything evil . . . "
The Kammic predicament
The Kammic predicament:
The Buddhist concept of Kamma is probably best understood in terms of the 'Human Predicament'.
Unknowingly, we are the result of our past Kamma and, unknowingly conditioned by this, we equally unknowingly create our future Kamma. In this delusion our predicament is perfect.
However, the good news is that, in order to break out, we only need to know! It's that simple.
In the meantime, however, all we need to do is refrain from evil, do good, and purify the mind. Then things can only get better: if at least in the longer term!
The Kilesa Raft
The Kilesa Raft.
The kilesas are simply the unknown, unspoken & unquestioned conditioning of the Citta, & are the resultants of past Kamma, as they ripen in the present moment.
Thus the perceived need to create skilful Kamma in the present time, over & above any good, healthy & wholesome Kamma, so as to have skilful Kilesas in a future lifetime. Thus building a Kilesa "Raft" which the the practitioner can use to "cross over" the stream of Samsara & "reach the further shore" of Realisation.
Thus, on reaching "the further shore" the raft can then be left abandoned at the waters edge or "let go of" & the practitioner thus walks on "free of all burdens".
Two Books
Two Books.
The two books, on drawing & geometry, will develop mindfulness and wisdom in any practitioner who has generosity and self honesty.
The two books, on drawing & geometry, can be seen as generosity and self honesty applied to the reader himself. And an extensively illustrated Latin primer, too.
Proofs are the the hardest of all the Geometry skills.
Others will tell one that drawing is the hardest of all the visual art skills.
The art book author says that drawing an accurate portrait is the hardest of all the drawing skills.
For some, mindfulness of the heart is the hardest of all the body mindfulness skills.
Curiosity killed the cat
Curiosity killed the cat
The end of wanting to look & know.
TanAjahn Mun
Is the Heart (Knowing) the owner of the knowable? Does it need the knowable in order to know?
Subjectivity is not the Knowing
Subjectivity is not the Knowing.
The Knowing is not Subjectivity.
When subjectivity attaches itself to the Knowing and ceases to attach to the Khandhas, then nothing in the Khandhas can ever disturb the Knowing.
Sunday, January 15, 2006
Dukkha is . . .
Dukkha is when subjectivity, i.e. the Proliferation of assumptions, is unable to keep pace with the objective world.
Space Energy is:-
Space Energy is:-
'White noise' energy at the centre of the heart, out-flowing from the centre of the heart.
Subjectivity = assumptions
Subjectivity = assumptions, proliferation, Sankhaara.
Objectivity = memory, perception, Sa~n~naa.
Subjectivity = UnKnowable, Citta lost in its own functions, which in turn is Knowable.
Objectivity = Knowable.
Thus Proliferation becomes Perception simply by the fact of clearly knowing the Proliferation just as it is.
Subjectivity is not the Knowing
Subjectivity is not the Knowing.
However, when subjectivity identifies with the knowing the the meditator 's work is done.
Achieved through endless practice of staying with the Knowing, until it becomes a habitual reflex. At that point it only requires a Kammic window of opportunity for the Heart to fix this so as to drop all its unspoken and unquestioned assumptions. No more jumping to conclusions ever again. Though memories and other perceptions will still continue to arise.
The Beautiful Body
The Beautiful Body.
The 32 parts of the body are not so much repulsive, as more 'not-intoxicating', the idea being to dampen passion. But with the wrong character type (hate) excessive use can lead to loathing & hatred. Also can lead to depression in a greed person.
On seeing Danger & the Escape
On seeing Danger & the Escape.
"When the Sainsbury's broiler hits the bench test rotor blades."
When positive attitudes seem too naive, try seeing danger & let adrenaline do all the work.
On seeing danger
On seeing danger: the six senses.
On seeing escape: realising the danger.
On seeing refuge: a rotting corps.
Proliferation becomes Perception
Proliferation becomes Perception simply by the fact of clearly Knowing the Proliferation just as it is.
So the practice becomes not so much stopping Proliferation as more becoming aware of it: being with the knowing of it.
When this knowing becomes automatic the practice enters into an entirely new phase.
Receiving Dana
Receiving Dana.
Layfolk give Dana to that aspect of the Bhikkhu which is developing in the Dhamma & to support its training. The person receiving it is just "Smoke & mirrors".
In the conventional mind
In the conventional mind, without Memory, Perception is meaningless (this usually passes for Knowledge). Whereas in the clear Citta there is just direct Knowing without reference to anything else.
Similarly, Kamma formations are primarily thoughts: activities which accumulate in tendency and thus conviction. Hence conditioning.
Kilesas and Telepathy
Kilesas and Telepathy
Exert From LuangPor Punya's letter to a disciple. (FDN)This was written about halfway through the year in which I was with him. Throughout this year he constantly emphasised (to me) that only the heart existed; that was where everything happened; wouldn't accept any thoughts on telepathy at all; wouldn't accept any question on it as valid. Yet, unbeknown to me, we have this letter, written, by him to his disciple, halfway through that very same year.
What to make of this? He was clearly laying colossal emphasis on the kilesas in the heart as the prime focus of attention, irrespective of which of the six senses was triggering them off.
". . . We don't get swamped by other people's cittas because the citta is attached to the five khandhas (oneself), but there is some interference with other people. There is telepathy which is more common than most people realise.
"No, the citta is not neutral, it is infused with the kilesas. But when purified it has gone beyond Samsara.
22nd January 2004 "
(FDN)So telepathy does exist after all!!! But going "out" to it's sources is not the answer. Looking into the heart is, as usual, the answer. Look & see what is happening, develop clarity around the corresponding kilesas & stay with the Knowing. Whether it is fear (& terror) or anything else.
Kilesas, the Enemy
Kilesas, the Enemy
[Excerpt from a recorded talk with LuangPaw Pa~n~nava.d.dho: (FDN=my comments)]
(FDN) Basically, this seems to be the unknown, conditioning of the Citta, by the resultants of past Kamma, as they ripen in the present moment, of which the Citta is totally & completely unaware.
Thus the perceived need to create skilful Kamma in this lifetime, over & above any good Kamma, so as to have skilful Kilesas in a future lifetime.
Needless to say, the most skilful Kamma is Bhikkhu ordination so as to develop the Path, i.e. the Bhikkhu life. This makes the Bhikkhu a virtual field of merit for anyone else to share in, simply by choosing to support his practice.
--
(FDN)The dialogue below seems to be consistent with the results of developed mindfulness. In that, going against the K's, going towards fear, awkwardness etc., is possibly the best exercise in mindfulness that there is.
Q:
How does one begin to know if ones efforts are having an effect on reducing the Ks? Is there something, especially for beginners?
LP P:
One finds, I would say, one's own estimation of one's self-importance, I don't mean in theory, but one's feeling of it becomes greater. In the sense that - I don't mean in the bad way - of one's own worth, in oneself, quite regardless of what anyone else thinks. One's worth in oneself, one doesn't feel that one's like an old foot-rag. Inside one feels that one has something that's valuable. And that thing of value starts growing. And one finds also that there's firmness inside. There's a firmness that is capable of fighting the Ks and going against them. All these things do show externally, but the external thing is not what matters, that's just a by-product: it's the internal thing that matters all the time.
Knowing the subject & object
Knowing the subject & object.
Looking @ subjectivity & objectivity successively may (given sufficient clarity & calmness of the heart) lead back to the subjectivity of the knowing, the true emptiness of the real subjectivity. In any case, it is sure to bring up some kilesas.
Learn to die before you die
Learn to die before you die, so that you don't die when you do die.
Anando Bhikku
Eating Etiquette
Eating Etiquette
The Lord Buddha allowed Bhikkus to eat cooked food, between dawn & noon when freely donated by lay supporters.
This one principle meal is therefore a period during which the senses are particularly vulnerable to heedlessness and the Citta to its Kilesas: and hence represents a potential breach in the continuity of the practice.
Thus many rules of etiquette are applied so as to make this a ritual where mindfulness is called for throughout the duration of this daily procedure.
If it changes it isn't real
If it changes it isn't real.
If it doesn't change it can't be detected.
LuangPor's paraphrase of the W.W.I joke: Advice for Private Tommy Atkins.
In peace time:
If it moves, salute it.
If it doesn't move, whitewash it.
In war time:
If it moves, shoot it.
If it doesn't move, salute it.
Variations on this theme are quite common among English speaking people of LuangPow's generation.
Fifth precept
Fifth precept, refraining from intoxicants & substance abuse, is to protect the meditator from heedlessness leading to a breaking of the first four.
Generosity is the base
Generosity is the base on which to develop skilful moral discipline so as to develop an attitude of restraint for the benefit of others. This builds confidence, which then leads into the development of 1st Jhana, a very deep sense of joy, which in turn leads to a very deep sense of rapture, etc.
Honesty & Shamelessness
Honesty & Shamelessness.
Blatant & unexpected outbursts of shameless admittance or assertion passing for honesty, (i.e. true understanding, or investigation of the way things actually are). Trusting the power of the pure mind or a given fortuitous predicament at a given time. If the power of the pure mind is unfamiliar at a given time, then faith or confidence in it can't be expected to be particularly strong. If it is, however, then faith/confidence in it may then become too strong, to the detriment of the other remaining skilful faculties.
Dhamma is like an iPaq1940
Dhamma is like an iPaq1940.
The iPaq 1940 works perfectly out of the box.
A complete dummy can get perfect results by just keeping to the defaults & not resetting anything. On the other hand, a graduate in computer science can get it to perform to spec. in all its features. But anyone with only partial knowledge soon gets bogged down with all the available options, not knowing which is which. Pure Dukkha.
Differences Between Nimitas
Differences Between Nimitas
of Internal & External Origination.
Asking the question, ". . . If this is me, then who is it that knows? . . ." or some other similar ploy that will objectify a subjective experience when such are internally originated.
Thus if the subjectivity of the experience continues, it is most likely to be an externally originated Nimita.
External Nimitas are picked up by the conscious faculty of the mind/heart in much the same way that a radio picks up signals via an aerial. So that mental raw data impinges on the mind in much the same way that physical raw data impinges on any of the physical sense bases corresponding to the radio's aerial.
In either case the mind takes this raw data and interprets it in much the same way. Thereby constructing a model that we take to be the real world: an unspoken & unquestioned assumption; a subjective experience.
As such it is almost impossible to distinguish between internal & external Nimitas. So that ploys, which use some kind of logical reasoning to effect a change from subjectivity to objectivity, are required.
Thus the correspondence between internal & subjectivity, external & objectivity is thereby invalidated.
Dukkha - Gateway to Dhamma
Annica can be regular Samsaric change or insight into impermanence.
Dukkha is a Gateway to Dhamma.
Anatta is insight into Dhamma.
Dukkha & Sukkha
Dukkha & Sukkha
Is it Dukkha or Sukkha: both or neither?
Is it internal or external: both or neither?
Is is not known: don't know?
Just this knowing for clarity and recollection, to establish mindfulness, i.e. awareness of here & now, i.e. self knowledge.
What ever it takes to break through subjectivity and set up objectivity.
Dukkha is Annica
Dukkha is Annica: & the knowing of this objectifies it.
Subjectivity is Annica: & the knowing of this objectifies it.
Delusion is Annica: & the knowing of this objectifies it.
Outflows are Annica: & the knowing of these objectifies them.
Annica is Annica: & the knowing of it objectifies this too.
Anattaa is Annica: & the knowing of this
keeps mindfulness on it, keeping it objectified as Path.
Saturday, January 14, 2006
I think, therefore I am
I think, therefore I am. There is the knowing of this assumption, and there is the not knowing of this assumption. That's all there is to wisdom and delusion and the difference between them: just this knowing.
Citta essay
Citta essay.
From a letter by LuangPor Panyavaddho to a disciple, undated but probably sometime during 1979.
... In connection with the Citta, I can only explain it as I have understood it from Tan Achaan.
Firstly, one must not try to understand the Citta from the view point of the khandhas. The Citta is the fundamental and "real" one which does not die and which cannot be understood from the viewpoint of Sa.msaara because it is beyond Sa.msaara. Therefore one cannot say that it is or it isn't, nor where it is nor when. All such categories are of Sa.msaara. Nor can one say that it goes from life to life because this is a Sa.msaara viewpoint which sees the real importance as being "life": but the Citta is the real one, not this life or that life, and it has no goings or comings. Unfortunately however the Citta is permeated with Avijjaa. Finally speaking the Avijjaa is no more real than anything else in Sa.msaara, but it does effectively prevent the Citta knowing its own nature because of which it is modified and goes out searching for that which is real, true, beautiful etc. In other words it searches for is own fundamental nature in external things and due to Avijjaa in its mode of Tanhaa it grasps at a body to be an "image" of itself and it animates the body by functions of the Citta, these being Vedanaa, Sa~n~naa, Sankhaara and Vi~n~naana. But always these are unsatisfactory (Dukkha) because they are a substitute for the Citta itself, and they are Anicca, Dukkha, Anattaa, whereas the Citta is Nicca, Sukha, Attaa (Attaa as being the contrary of Anattaa - but not a "self").
With regard to the modifications of the Citta, the Citta is 'real' and Sa.mSaara is 'unreal' because it all Anicca, Dukkha & Anattaa, so from the viewpoint of the Citta these things are all phantom like and the real nature of the Citta never alters. So although the Citta is deluded by Sa.msaara it is really deluding itself because it imbues Sa.msaara with its own delusion (i.e.: we see people, animals, horses, trees without realising that they are all mere Sankhaaras and quite impersonal phenomena). The greatest delusion of the Citta is the rooted view that Self or Soul is within, or part of the five Khandhas. The Khandhas are quite unnecessary to the Citta, but because the Citta does not know its own nature it grasps them tightly being unable to comprehend what it would mean without them. If the Citta does not have the five Khandhas it fears that it will vanish and disappear into annihilation. But in fact they are a great burden and load on the Citta and due to Avijjaa are poison because it is by means of the five khandhas that we constantly make Kamma. To the Arahant, however, they can still be of use for teaching others and helping the world in various ways. Without a Citta the five khandhas cannot operate: they die.
I don't know TCH's views about three Cittas, but fundamentally there is only one. But when one talks of the modifications of the Citta they do sometimes talk of this Citta and that Citta. Then in the Abidhamma they describe 89 (I think) Cittas, such as 12 rooted in Lobha, 4 in Dosa and 4 in Moha (the figures may not be correct, I can't remember it now). But all these are modifications of the Citta and calling them different Cittas is just a way of speaking.
From the viewpoint of Sa.msaara, the Citta is mysterious. One text I know of talks of it having the characteristics of will, knowing and action. The action being non Kamma forming in the pure Citta.
The things that can pop up out of the Citta are incredible. They are all Sankhaaras so they form together like clouds then break up and disperse. The reason for their arising are rooted mainly in the past, but it probably needs a Buddha to understand their full extent.
The trees can of course throw out new shoots, until they are cut down at the roots by Pa~n~na. But it is a part of the daily practice to try and be mindful and use wisdom to avoid planting new seeds and pull up tender shoots before they grow strong.
Yrs
Pa~n~navaddho
PS. In fairness I must say that TA has not said all the above, but it is I think fairly based on his general teaching.
Delusion is merely confusion
Delusion is merely confusion between subjectivity & objectivity.
Subjectivity can never be found; it is always that which is being objective & can only ever see objects: it can never see the subject: (which was never born & never dies).
Just as a camera can never photograph itself, the Citta/subject can never know itself: it can only know objects.
Hence the common preference, among translators, for the term "Mind Objects" for the forth Sattipathana "Dhamma contemplation of Dhammas".
Character Types & Opposites
Character Types & Opposites.
In general, a meditator is the opposite of what he thinks he is: & in trying to work out what that would be for himself is a very useful exercise in mindful contemplation: a skill well worth developing.
Hate types prefer the rush of adrenaline.
Greed types prefer the release of craving or expectation driven tension that accompanies gratification in some sensory field.
Bhikku vis-Ã -vis Lay
In Theravadha Buddhism, Bhikkus can't live in isolation as in Mahayaana or Xianity. Bhikkus live in interdependent relationship with lay. That is to say: a Bhikkhu is not an entity in isolation. He is a Bhikkhu only in relation to lay people: and vice-versa. In isolation, each of these types function according to it's own ways, i.e. of practice.
It is only when they come together that they can learn their respective roles &/or train each other, interactively & interdependently. So much so, that for a Bhikkhu to travel alone, with/to lay folk, his personal practice must be very solid. For this interaction/interdependence is at the very centre of the Middle Way: making meditators of both Bhikkhus & lay folk.
Aasavas - Outflows - Triggers
Aasavas - Outflows - Triggers.
Four ways to trigger off Aasavas.
1) Sense desires: Seeing a 'Self' where there is no 'Self'. E.g.. in other people; in one's own self.
2) Views about a 'Self', conceit: I am > another,
I am < another,
I am = another.
3) Bavana developments: Strong desire to teach latest insight. Conceit: I am >, I am<, I am =.
4) Delusion, false assumptions or conclusions.
Dullness is a cause for jumping to false conclusions. And is a traditional characteristic of ignorance, illustrated by a pig icon in 'Wheel of Life' tankas.
Seeing a 'Self' where there is no 'Self'. E.g.. in other people; in one's own self.
Just enough for knowing & remembering.
Ajaan Dukkha is the best teacher
Ajaan Dukkha is the best teacher of all. He is always there, never letting anyone down. He will take every practitioner all the way to full realisation.
Anicca is a mass of assumption
Anicca is a mass of assumption & conclusion, assertion & denial.
Dukkha is the result of this.
Anatta is the realisation of this result.
Assumptions & Presumptions
Assumptions & Presumptions.
The very nature of delusion.
Just need to know them: just as they are.
Subjectivity associated with Dullness
Subjectivity associated with Dullness.
Delusion in general is subjectivity associated with anything & everything.
The Citta needs to see the heart
The Citta needs to see the heart objectively, so that it can realize it isn't it, but instead is the knowing of it.
The only true subjectivity is in the knowing.
Knowing the knowing leads to further knowing. Nothing else has this characteristic, ie everything else changes. Thus the idea that the pure Citta is unchanging.
In the unenlightened meditator , the base of knowing is centred on the physical Heart.
Kilesas, Telepathy, etc
Kilesas, Telepathy, etc.
Exert from a letter of LuangPow Panya's to a disciple.
. . . As to your question: the five khandhas are the basis of sensation. The body is the basis of the four nama khandhas and all of them disappear when the body dies*. The senses require three things for them to function: the object, the active sense organ, and consciousness turned to the relevant sense. In other words, for seeing to take place consciousness must be turned to the eyes plus visible object. At this time none of the other senses are operative. Then consciousness dies away, but it is a very rapid process. Consciousness is the Citta performing the function of seeing, hearing, etc. The five khandhas are the playground of the citta under the influence of the Kilesas which are in the citta.
The citta can go anywhere but it cannot go to two places at the same time, but it can jump about very fast.
We don't get swamped by other people's cittas because the citta is attached to the five khandhas (oneself), but there is some interference with other people. There is telepathy which is more common than most people realise.
Getting to the heart is difficult but don't force it. You will probably find that you often go to the heart without realising it.
You should avoid criticism even when it is warranted, it is wrong for your character.
No, the citta is not neutral, it is infused with the kilesas. But when purified it has gone beyond Samsara.
I hope that this will help you to understand.
22nd January 2004
*This also includes the fifth physical 'rupa' khandha consisting of the four primary 'elements' + space + consciousness.(FDN)
Delusion is subjectivity
Delusion is subjectivity.
Subjectivity is delusion, the so called "distortion" of view due to Delusion.
Knowing can only know objects, where subjectivity is a 'special case' object. Hence, subjectivity is always Dukkha.
Delusion is just that assumption
Delusion is just that assumption, inference or conclusion, unspoken & unquestioned, rather than direct knowing.
Going towards the fear
Going towards the fear must be the most effective practice for mindfulness of all: second must come the practice of going against the grain.
Not talking about it
Talking about it takes the meditator away from mindfulness of the physical dimension, with resultant loss of skill in this.
Subjectivity is not the Self
The Self is not Subjectivity.
When subjectivity attaches itself to objectivity and ceases to attach to the Self, then nothing in the Khandhas can ever disturb the Self.
Friday, January 13, 2006
Terror is a jump to a conclusion
Terror is a jump to a conclusion.
Where ever there's terror, there's a self view, an assumption.
Terror is just a jump to that conclusion.
Wanting the subjectivity
Wanting the subjectivity that comes from objective experience. How deluded!